Iris 1 (2):353-374 (2009)
What are the differences between philosophy and science, or between the methods of philosophy and the methods of science? Unlike some philosophers we do not find philosophy and the methods of philosophy to be sui generis. Science, and in particular neuroscience, has much to tell us about the nature of the world and the concepts that we must use to understand and explain it. Yet science cannot function well without reflective analysis of the concepts, methods, and practices that constitute it. For example, experimental methods and their resulting empirical data are essential for understanding the world, yet such data is not a-conceptual. Understanding how and what theoretical assumptions, conceptual assumptions, and practical knowledge guide the use of experimental methods is relevant to understanding the results of that use. In this way, philosophy – whether done by philosophers or scientists – has a role to play in understanding the world. Neuroscience is typically individualistic in focus; nonetheless, the mechanisms of learning and linguistic ability that some neuroscientists study also have a role to play in understanding communication. Philosophy cannot offer adequate understanding, even conceptual clarity, in isolation from empirical investigation. Yet, this does not require that science or scientific concepts will replace or reduce philosophical concepts, let alone those of ordinary language
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Experimental Philosophy of Science.Paul E. Griffiths & Karola Stotz - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (3):507–521.
Evolutionary and Neuroscience Approaches to the Study of Cognition.Warren Schmaus - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):675-686.
The Rise and Fall of Experimental Philosophy.Antti Kauppinen - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):95 – 118.
How to Separate Conceptual Issues From Empirical Ones in the Study of Consciousness.Prof Max Velmans - 2007 - In Rahul Banerjee & Bikas Chakrabarti (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Elsevier.
Psychology and the Use of Intuitions in Philosophy.Brian Talbot - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):157-176.
Anti- Naturalism: The Role of Non-Empirical Methods in Philosophy.Aaron Barth - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):196-206.
Towards a Philosophy of Chemistry.Joachim Schummer - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):307 - 336.
Between the Fundamental and the Phenomenological: The Challenge of 'Semi-Empirical' Methods.Jeffry L. Ramsey - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):627-653.
The Proper Province of Philosophy.Justin Sytsma - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3):427-445.
Philosophy of Science as the Object of Metaphilosophical Investigations.Sergey F. Martynovich - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 46:63-74.
Neuroscientists Need to Be Evolutionarily Challenged.Robert A. Barton - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):13-14.
Theory and Truth: Philosophical Critique Within Foundational Science.Lawrence Sklar - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Articulating the World: Experimental Systems and Conceptual Understanding.Joseph Rouse - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):243 - 254.
Added to index2013-11-24
Total downloads24 ( #209,553 of 2,164,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?