Philosophical Studies 149 (3):602-611 (2010)
Although cognitive scientists have learned a lot about concepts, their findings have yet to be organized in a coherent theoretical framework. In addition, after twenty years of controversy, there is little sign that philosophers and psychologists are converging toward an agreement about the very nature of concepts. Doing without Concepts (Machery 2009) attempts to remedy this state of affairs. In this article, I review the main points and arguments developed at greater length in Doing without Concepts
|Keywords||categorization concept concept combination dual-process eliminativism exemplar induction meaning natural kinds prototype reference theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief.Stephen P. Stich - 1983 - MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Thought Experiments and Philosophical Knowledge.Edouard Machery - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (3):191-214.
Concepts as Semantic Pointers: A Framework and Computational Model.Peter Blouw, Eugene Solodkin, Paul Thagard & Chris Eliasmith - 2015 - Cognitive Science 40 (1):n/a-n/a.
Similar books and articles
Higher-Level Concepts and Their Heterogeneous Implementations: A Polemical Review of Edouard Machery's Doing Without Concepts.Kevan Edwards - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (1):119-133.
How to Cut a Concept? Review of Doing Without Concepts by Edouard Machery.Hugo Mercier - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):269-277.
Concepts and Cognitive Science.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 1999 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 3-81.
Concepts and Theoretical Unification.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):219-220.
Added to index2010-02-27
Total downloads151 ( #30,563 of 2,158,458 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #193,769 of 2,158,458 )
How can I increase my downloads?