Quantification, Regulation, and Risk Assessment

PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:243 - 260 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The basic question for risk assessment is not "What are the risks?" but "How safe is safe enough?" Its ambitious goal is to make risk management a scientific enterprise. In order to succeed, not only must risks be quantified but also the many kinds of costs and benefits associated with technology and its control must be quantified and we must find a common metric for comparing these different factors. The risks of risk assessment include the possibility of distorting values in the quest for general comparability and also the problem of responding rationally to different kinds of uncertainty. The problems discussed include comparing novel events to statistically frequent events, comparing different distributions of risk, and quantifying the value of saving human lives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Risk, fear, blame, shame and the regulation of public safety.Jonathan Wolff - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):409-427.
Some Public Policy Problems with the Science of Carcinogen Risk Assessment.Carl F. Cranor - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:467 - 488.
Economic (ir)rationality in risk analysis.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):231-241.
Risk, uncertainty, and rational action.Carlo Jaeger (ed.) - 2001 - London: Earthscan.
Relative uncertainty in term loan projection models: what lenders could tell risk managers.Lisa Warenski - 2012 - Journal of Experimental and Artificial Intelligence 24 (4):501-511.
Assessment of strategies for evaluating extreme risks.James Franklin & Scott Sisson - 2007 - Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis Reports.
Valuing risk: The ethical review of clinical trial safety.Jonathan Kimmelman - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):369-393.
Antibiotic Resistance Due to Modern Agricultural Practices: An Ethical Perspective. [REVIEW]Joan Duckenfield - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):333-350.
What's Really Wrong with Quantitative Risk Assessment?Helen E. Longino - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:376 - 383.
What's Wrong with Quantitative Risk Assessment?Dale Hattis & John A. Smith - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:375 -.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
31 (#501,295)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas MacLean
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references