The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:51-67 (2001)
The thesis that propositions of law are intrinsically arguable is opposed by the antithesis that the Rule of Law is valued for the sake of legal certainty. The synthesis considers the insights of theories of rhetoric and proceduralist theories of practical reason, then locates the problem of indeterminacy of law in the context of the challengeable character of governmental action under free governments. This is not incompatible with, but required by the Rule of Law, which is misstated as securing legal certainty. Defeasible certainty is the most that is desirable or achievable
|Keywords||Conference Proceedings Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jurisprudence and Communication: Secular and Religious.Bernard S. Jackson - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (3):463-484.
Similar books and articles
Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning.Neil MacCormick - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and Modern Law.Teemu Ruskola - 2013 - Harvard University Press.
The Rules of Law in the Reform of Legal Education: Teaching the Legal Mind in Japanese Law Schools.James R. Maxeiner - unknown
Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law.Colleen Murphy - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.
Scientia Iuris - an Unsolved Philosophical Problem.Aleksander Peczenik - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):273-302.
Is the Rule of Law Really Indifferent to Human Rights?Evan Fox-Decent - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (6):533 - 581.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads35 ( #146,050 of 2,163,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,913 of 2,163,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?