Jack MacIntosh
University of Calgary
Abstract Boyle distinguished clearly between the areas which we would call scientific and theological. However, he felt that they overlapped seamlessly, and that the truths we discovered (or which were revealed to us) in one of these areas would be relevant to us in the other. In this paper I outline and discuss Boyle's views on the limitations of human knowing, Boyle's arguments in favour of accepting the revelations of the Christian faith, and his views on the kind of epistomological standing that scientific knowledge claims have. Given this background I then consider the relation between hypotheses, theories and facts in Boyle's work, and consider a particular case, that of Boyle's Law, as an exemplification of the claims made in the rest of the paper
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698599208573419
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,513
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1689 - Oxford University Press.
A Study of Spinoza's 'Ethics'.Jonathan Bennett - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Animals, Morality and Robert Boyle.J. J. MacIntosh - 1996 - Dialogue 35 (3):435-472.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #241,564 of 2,446,524 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,659 of 2,446,524 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes