Oxford University Press (2000)

Authors
Marcello Pera
University of Pisa
Peter Machamer
University of Pittsburgh
Abstract
Traditionally it has been thought that scientific controversies can always be resolved on the basis of empirical data. Recently, however, social constructionists have claimed that the outcome of scientific debates is strongly influenced by non-evidential factors such as the rhetorical prowess and professional clout of the participants. This volume of previously unpublished essays by well-known philosophers of science presents historical studies and philosophical analyses that undermine the plausibility of an extreme social constructionist perspective while also indicating the need for a richer and more realistic account of scientific rationality.
Keywords Science Philosophy  Science Social aspects  Science History
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
Call number Q175.S42323 2000
ISBN(s) 0195119878   9780195119879
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,972
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
45 ( #223,278 of 2,410,099 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #348,045 of 2,410,099 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes