Standard of Care, Institutional Obligations, and Distributive Justice

Bioethics 29 (4):352-359 (2015)

Authors
Abstract
The problem of standard of care in clinical research concerns the level of treatment that investigators must provide to subjects in clinical trials. Commentators often formulate answers to this problem by appealing to two distinct types of obligations: professional obligations and natural duties. In this article, I investigate whether investigators also possess institutional obligations that are directly relevant to the problem of standard of care, that is, those obligations a person has because she occupies a particular institutional role. I examine two types of institutional contexts: (1) public research agencies – agencies or departments of states that fund or conduct clinical research in the public interest; and (2) private-for-profit corporations. I argue that investigators who are employed or have their research sponsored by the former have a distinctive institutional obligation to conduct their research in a way that is consistent with the state's duty of distributive justice to provide its citizens with access to basic health care, and its duty to aid citizens of lower income countries. By contrast, I argue that investigators who are employed or have their research sponsored by private-for-profit corporations do not possess this obligation nor any other institutional obligation that is directly relevant to the ethics of RCTs. My account of the institutional obligations of investigators aims to contribute to the development of a reasonable, distributive justice-based account of standard of care
Keywords institutional obligations  standard of care  distributive justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014, 2015
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12060
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):246-253.
Just Health Care.Cheyney Ryan & Norman Daniels - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (2):287.
Coercion.Alan Wertheimer - 1989 - Ethics 99 (3):642-644.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Significance of the Concept of Disease for Justice in Health Care.Thomas Schramme - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):121-135.
Parental Obligation.Nellie Wieland - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (3):249-267.
Gratuity, Embodiment, and Reciprocity.Sandra Sullivan-Dunbar - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (2):254-279.
How Devolution Upsets Distributive Justice.Shlomi Segall - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):257-272.
Distributive Justice and Clinical Trials in the Third World.D. R. Cooley - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (3):151-167.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-17

Total views
687 ( #4,264 of 2,243,850 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #11,922 of 2,243,850 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature