The Convergence of National Rational Self-Interest and Justice in Space Policy

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 37 (1):87-106 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How may nations protect their interests in space if its fragility makes military operations there self-defeating? This essay claims nations are in Prisoners Dilemmas on the matter, and applies David Gauthier’s theories about how it is rational to behave morally—cooperatively—in such dilemmas. Currently space-faring nations should i) enter into co-operative space sharing arrangements with other rational nations, ii) exclude—militarily, but with only terrestrial force—nations irrational or existentially opposed to other nations being in space, and iii) incentivize all nations into co-operation by redistributing some space-generated wealth to nations that might otherwise ruin space. Further, since all nations are rationally incentivized to ever greater dependence on space, and since each, by threatening space, can hold hostage its benefits to all, each can demand resolution of terrestrial discontents with other nations. So each has a rational interest in treating others morally both in space and on terrestrial issues.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-09

Downloads
234 (#101,269)

6 months
95 (#62,071)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Duncan MacIntosh
Dalhousie University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references