"What the Wild Things are: A Critique on Clare Palmer's" What Do We Owe Animals?"

Between the Species 16 (1):6 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper critiques Clare Palmer’s “What do we owe wild animals?” on three grounds. First, it is argued that, Palmer’s opening case study notwithstanding, there are good empirical reasons to think that we should assist domesticated horses and not wild deer. Then, Palmer’s claim that “wildness is not a capacity” is brought into question, and it is argued that wildness connotes certain capacities which wild animals generally have and which domesticated animals generally lack. Lastly, the “supererogation problem” is developed against a version of Palmer’s preferred Contextualist view, which claims that, while her view doesn’t obligate us to eliminate predators and otherwise redesign nature in the name of wild animal welfare, it may nonetheless allow them. Therefore, this view has potentially unsettling environmental implications



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What (If Anything) Do We Owe Wild Animals?Clare A. Palmer - 2013 - Between the Species 16 (1):4.
The rights of wild things.Stephen R. L. Clark - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):171 – 188.
On Wild Animals, Hubris, and Redemption.Susan Nance - 2012 - Society and Animals 20 (4):401-407.
Placing animals in urban environmental ethics.Clare Palmer - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1):64–78.
The reintroduction and reinterpretation of the wild.Eileen O'Rourke - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):144-165.
The medical treatment of wild animals.Robert W. Loftin - 1985 - Environmental Ethics 7 (3):231-239.
Live Free or Die. [REVIEW]Joel Marks - 2010 - Animal Law 17 (1):243-250.
The wild animal as a research animal.Jac A. A. Swart - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):181-197.
The Idea of the Domesticated Animal Contract.Clare Palmer - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (4):411 - 425.


Added to PP

65 (#185,730)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joel MacClellan
Loyola University, New Orleans

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references