Anticipation and variation in visual content

Philosophical Studies 165 (2):335-347 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is composed of three parts. In the first part of the article I take up a question raised by Susanna Siegel (Philosophical Review 115: 355–388, 2006a). Siegel has argued that subjects have the following anticipation: (PC) If S substantially changes her perspective on o, her visual phenomenology will change as a result of this change. She has left it an open question as to whether subjects anticipate a specific kind of change. I take up this question and answer it in the affirmative. By appealing to a widely held view of perceptual content, the view that we represent ‘factual’ properties in perception, I argue that (PC) can be refined as follows: (PC’) If S substantially changes her perspective on o, her visual phenomenology will present different views of o’s factual properties. In the second part of the article I argue that (PC’) implies that there are cases in which normal perceivers have different perceptual content under identical viewing conditions. The differences in perceptual content are due to differences in the determinacy of visual anticipation. I draw the conclusion that perceptual content is rich in the sense that it includes a unique contribution from individual perceivers. In the final part of the article, I discuss some open issues regarding the way in which (PC’) relates to the personal/sub-personal distinction, empirical models, and the distinction between perception and cognition

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,078

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Michael Madary's Visual Phenomenology. [REVIEW]Neil Mehta - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (1):131-134.
Visual Phenomenology.Michael Madary - 2016 - Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Visual Contents: Beyond Reach?Kristjan Laasik - 2015 - Philosophical Forum 46 (2):193-204.
Attention and perceptual content.Bence Nanay - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):263-270.
Specialized Visual Experiences.Casey Landers - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 71 (1):74-98.
Perception, Content, Generality.Andrea Giananti - 2020 - Theoria 86 (2):245-267.
The Visual Experience of Kinds.Andrei I. Marasoiu - 2013 - Dissertation, Georgia State University
Experience and content.Alex Byrne - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):429-451.
Do We Perceive Natural Kind Properties?Berit Brogaard - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (1):35 - 42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-31

Downloads
84 (#208,123)

6 months
17 (#259,157)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Madary
University of the Pacific

References found in this work

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2004 - MIT Press.
How the Body Shapes the Mind.Shaun Gallagher - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 44 references / Add more references