Enlightenment and redemption: On the consequences of two different versions of critical theory for educational administration

Educational Philosophy and Theory 25 (2):1–20 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1469-5812.1993.tb00190.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Theodor W. Adorno: an introduction.Gerhard Schweppenhäuser - 2009 - Durham [NC]: Duke University Press.
Aesthetic dimensions of educational administration & leadership.Eugénie Angèle Samier & Richard J. Bates (eds.) - 2006 - New York: Routledge.
Consequences of Enlightenment.Anthony J. Cascardi - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The nature and limits of critical theory in education.Trevor Maddock - 1999 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 31 (1):43–61.
Doing educational administration: a theory of administrative practice.C. W. Evers - 2000 - New York: Pergamon Press. Edited by Gabriele Lakomski.
Defending the Radical Enlightenment.Charles W. Mills - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:9-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#616,937)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and human interests.Jürgen Habermas - 1971 - London [etc.]: Heinemann Educational.
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.David M. Rasmussen - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.
Wittgenstein's Vienna.Allan Janik - 1973 - Chicago: I.R. Dee. Edited by Stephen Toulmin.

View all 33 references / Add more references