It's always both: Changing individuals requires changing systems and changing systems requires changing individuals

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e168 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

S-frames and i-frames do not represent two opposed types of intervention. Rather they are interpretive lenses for focusing on specific aspects of interventions, all of which include individual and structural dimensions. There is no sense to be made of prioritizing either system change or individual change, because each requires the other.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Veganism, Normative Change, and Second Nature.Simon Lumsden - 2017 - Environmental Philosophy 14 (2):221-238.
Climate Change and Structural Emissions.Monica Aufrecht - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):201-213.
Changing Values: A Commentary on Hall.Lori Gruen, William Johnston & Clement Loo - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (2):142 - 144.
Anticipation requires adaptation.Christian Balkenius & Peter Gärdenfors - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):199-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-31

Downloads
367 (#67,717)

6 months
133 (#33,891)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Alex Madva
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Daniel Kelly
Purdue University
Michael Brownstein
John Jay College of Criminal Justice (CUNY)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Beyond Freedom and Dignity.B. F. Skinner - 1974 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 7 (1):58-69.
The Inevitability of Aiming for Virtue.Alex Madva - 2019 - In Benjamin R. Sherman & Stacey Goguen (eds.), Overcoming Epistemic Injustice: Social and Psychological Perspectives. London: Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 85-100.

Add more references