Repugnant Desires and the Two-Tier Conception of Utility

Utilitas 6 (2):171 (1994)

Authors
Madison Powers
Georgetown University
Abstract
An important objection to many utilitarian theories is that their conceptions of utility may count as morally relevant contributions to individual well-being items which are morally or rationally suspect. For example, if the conception of utility is pleasure, or alternatively, the fulfilment of actual desire or satisfaction of preferences, then greater individual utility may be produced by whatever increases pleasure, fulfils desire, or satisfies someone's preferences. This is true no matter how disgusting or vile we may think such pleasures are, or how irrational or distasteful we find the fulfilment of a desire or the satisfaction of some preference
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820800001540
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,000
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
69 ( #109,112 of 2,236,200 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #41,794 of 2,236,200 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature