Twin Paradox and the Logical Foundation of Relativity Theory

Foundations of Physics 36 (5):681-714 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We study the foundation of space-time theory in the framework of first-order logic (FOL). Since the foundation of mathematics has been successfully carried through (via set theory) in FOL, it is not entirely impossible to do the same for space-time theory (or relativity). First we recall a simple and streamlined FOL-axiomatization Specrel of special relativity from the literature. Specrel is complete with respect to questions about inertial motion. Then we ask ourselves whether we can prove the usual relativistic properties of accelerated motion (e.g., clocks in acceleration) in Specrel. As it turns out, this is practically equivalent to asking whether Specrel is strong enough to “handle” (or treat) accelerated observers. We show that there is a mathematical principle called induction (IND) coming from real analysis which needs to be added to Specrel in order to handle situations involving relativistic acceleration. We present an extended version AccRel of Specrel which is strong enough to handle accelerated motion, in particular, accelerated observers. Among others, we show that~the Twin Paradox becomes provable in AccRel, but it is not provable without IND

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Look at Simultaneity.Kent A. Peacock - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:542 - 552.
Is General Relativity Generally Relativistic?Roger Jones - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 381.
Special relativity in accelerated systems.Carlo B. Giannoni - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (3):382-392.
The relativity principle and the nature of time.F. Selleri - 1997 - Foundations of Physics 27 (11):1527-1548.
The clock paradox and thermodynamics.Philip Rosen - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (2):145-147.
A note on Dolby and Gull on radar time and the twin 'paradox'.Antony Eagle - 2005 - American Journal of Physics 73 (10):976–979.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
115 (#151,581)

6 months
25 (#111,330)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?