Who Reviews the Projects of Unaffiliated Researchers for Ethics? A Case Study from Alberta

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):346-355 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Developments in the last several years have sparked renewed interest in the ethics of research involving humans. Issues relating to the global extent of research and its guiding principles are of particular importance to researchers, health officials, and individual ethics committees who want a deeper and more encompassing inquiry regarding the foundation and evolution of human research. This department of CQ launches a long overdue effort to explore these wider issues. Readers are invited to submit papers to Charles MacKay, 5011 Worthington Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20816, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,245

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wisconsin Healthcare Ethics Committees.Robyn S. Shapiro, John P. Klein & Kristen A. Tym - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (3):288.
The Case: The “Ashley Treatment” Revisited.Ruchika Mishra - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
33 (#562,027)

6 months
11 (#263,017)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Stingl
University of Lethbridge

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references