A Comparative Study of Revelation and Prophecy According to Farabi and Ibn Sina

Avicennian Philosophy Journal 12 (39):5-24 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The explanation of revelation and prophecy has a special place in the view of Muslim philosophers. The ideas Farabi as the first Muslim philosopher who dealt with the prophecy and Ibn Sina in view of his original and precise conceptualization about prophecy and its foundations deserve inverstigation and have always been the subject of different commentaries. Some critics have found faults with Farabi that by introducing the concept of imagination in the process of revelation he has subordinated the place of prophet to that of philosophers and some have objected to Ibn Sina that by introducing the concept of guess in the process of revelation he is unable to account for revelation's knowledge to particular things and only universal knowledge of revelation in his theory are explicable, wheras Farabi recognizes the rational faculty of prophet as perceiving all the intelligible and separate substances and Ibn Sina as well has paid attention to the role of imaginative faculties in revelation and prophecy and has succeeded in explaining the knowledge to particulars things.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Islamic political philosophy: prophecy, revelation, and the divine law.Ludmila Bîrsan - 2011 - Annals of Philosophy, Social and Human Disciplines 2 (1):85-92.
Leibniz on 'prophets', prophecy, and revelation.Daniel J. Cook - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (3):269-287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-02

Downloads
4 (#1,543,698)

6 months
1 (#1,428,112)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references