Philosophy 74 (1):119-121 (1999)
A play's text is nearly all talk, and in the performance of a play the physical activity is sparse and exceedingly limited. Used of a play, the term ‘action’ does not mean what it normally means. Its true meaning is illuminated by reference to J. L. Austin and his doctrine of speech-acts. Dramatic action is, for the most part, speech-action. And a skilful manipulation of speech-acts enables the gifted dramatist not only to tell a story but to communicate what is going on below the surface.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Freedom of Communicative Action.Lawrence B. Solum - 1989 - Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135.
What Can Austin Tell Us About Truth?Jeffrey Hershfield - 2010 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (3):220-228.
Elements of Speech Act Theory in the Work of Thomas Reid.Karl Schuhmann & Barry Smith - 1990 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1):47 - 66.
Speech Acts Without Propositions?Marina Sbisà - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):155-178.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #219,601 of 2,171,691 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,691 )
How can I increase my downloads?