Biung-Ghi Ju/Unanimity and Resource Monotonicity 1–17 Young-Ran Roh/Is the Disposition of Constrained Maximization Chosen Rationally? 19–41 Eric Langlais/Willingness to pay for Risk Reduction and Risk Aversion without the Expected Utility As [Book Review]
Theory and Decision 59 (1):345-346 (2005)
AbstractA decomposition model of Net Final Values, named Systemic Value Added, is proposed for decision-making purposes, based on a systemic approach introduced in Magni [Magni, C. A., Bulletin of Economic Research 55, 149–176; Magni, C. A. Economic Modelling 21, 595–617]. The model translates the notion of excess profit giving formal expression to a counterfactual alternative available to the decision maker. Relations with other decomposition models are studied, among which Stewart’s [Stewart, G.B., The Quest for Value: The EVA™ Management Guide, Harper Collins, Publishers Inc]. The index here introduced differs from Stewart’s Economic Value Added in that it rests on a different interpretation of the notion of excess profit and is formally connected with the EVA model by means of a shadow project. The SVA is formally and conceptually threefold, in that it is economic, financial, accounting-flavoured. Some results are offered, providing sufficient and necessary conditions for decomposing NFV. Relations between a project’s SVA and its shadow project’s EVA are shown, all results of Pressacco and Stucchi [Pressacco, F. and Stucchi, P., Rivista di Matematica per le Scienze Economiche e Sociali 20, 165–185] are proved by making use of the systemic approach and the shadow counterparts of those results are also shown.
Similar books and articles
Willingness to Pay for Risk Reduction and Risk Aversion without the Expected Utility Assumption.Eric Langlais - 2005 - Theory and Decision 59 (1):43-50.
Is the Disposition of Constrained Maximization Chosen Rationally?Young-Ran Roh - 2005 - Theory and Decision 59 (1):19-41.
Parametric multi-attribute utility functions for optimal profit under risk constraints.Babacar Seck, Laetitia Andrieu & Michel De Lara - 2012 - Theory and Decision 72 (2):257-271.
Expected utility and constrained maximization: Problems of compatibility. [REVIEW]Hans Lottenbach - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (1):37 - 48.
The risk aversion measure without the independence axiom.Aldo Montesano - 1988 - Theory and Decision 24 (3):269-288.
Proper and Standard Risk Aversion in Two-Moment Decision Models.Fatma Lajeri-Chaherli - 2004 - Theory and Decision 57 (3):213-225.
Positivity of bid-ask spreads and symmetrical monotone risk aversion.Moez Abouda & Alain Chateauneuf - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (2):149-170.
Risk aversion in expected intertemporal discounted utilities bandit problems.Jean-Philippe Chancelier, Michel De Lara & André de Palma - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (4):433-440.
A note on decisions under uncertainty: the impact of the choice of the welfare measure.Andreas Lange - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (1):51-71.
Pareto utility.Masako Ikefuji, Roger J. A. Laeven, Jan R. Magnus & Chris Muris - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (1):43-57.
Nondegenerate Intervals of No-Trade Prices for Risk Averse Traders.Gerd Weinrich - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (1):79-99.
Temporal risk aversion: What determines the attitude of the decision Maker? The case of the buyer decision Maker.Paola Ferretti - unknown
Benchmark values for higher order coefficients of relative risk aversion.Michel Denuit & Béatrice Rey - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (1):81-94.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads