Category mistakes are meaningful

Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (6):553-581 (2009)
Abstract
Category mistakes are sentences such as ‘Colourless green ideas sleep furiously’ or ‘The theory of relativity is eating breakfast’. Such sentences are highly anomalous, and this has led a large number of linguists and philosophers to conclude that they are meaningless (call this ‘the meaninglessness view’). In this paper I argue that the meaninglessness view is incorrect and category mistakes are meaningful. I provide four arguments against the meaninglessness view: in Sect. 2, an argument concerning compositionality with respect to category mistakes; in Sect. 3 an argument concerning synonymy facts of category mistakes; in Sect. 4 concerning embeddings of category mistakes in propositional attitude ascriptions; and in Sect. 5 concerning the uses of category mistakes in metaphors. Having presented these arguments, in Sect. 6 I briefly discuss some of the positive motivations for accepting the meaninglessness view and argue that they are unconvincing. I conclude that the meaninglessness view ought to be rejected.
Keywords Category mistakes  Selectional restrictions  Selectional violations  Compositionality  Semantics  Foundations of semantics  Montague Grammar  Type theoretic semantics  Colorless green ideas sleep furiously  Meaning  Meaningfulness  Meaninglessness  Nonsense
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10988-010-9067-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - Routledge.
Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford University Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Russellians Can Have a No Proposition View of Empty Names.Thomas William Strickland Hodgson - forthcoming - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-22.
The Identity of a Material Thing and its Matter.Mahrad Almotahari - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (256):387-406.
Category Mistakes and Figurative Language.Ofra Magidor - 2015 - Philosophical Studies (1):1-14.
Nonsense and Illusions of Thought.Herman Cappelen - 2013 - Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):22-50.
Arguments by Leibniz’s Law in Metaphysics.Ofra Magidor - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (3):180-195.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mistakes.Paul A. Roth - 2003 - Synthese 136 (3):389 - 408.
``Mistakes''.Paul A. Roth - 2003 - Synthese 136 (3):389-408.
Category Mistakes and Classification.Robert Sharpe - 1967 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):204-207.
Category Mistakes in M&E.Gilbert Harman - 2003 - Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):165–180.
Two Mistakes Regarding the Principal Principle.Christopher J. G. Meacham - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):407-431.
The Persistence of Category Mistakes in Psychology.Per Holth - 2001 - Behavior and Philosophy 29:203 - 219.
Added to PP index
2010-02-20

Total downloads
173 ( #27,353 of 2,193,091 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #33,576 of 2,193,091 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature