On-line, just as off-line, there are ways of assessing the credibility of information sources. The Internet, although it arguably makes for nothing wholly new in this regard, complicates the ordinary task of assessing credibility. In the first section, I consider a specific example and argue that Internet content providers have no clear interest in resolving these comlications. In the second, I consider four general ways that we might assess credibility and explore how they apply to life online. Finally, I argue that even careful information gathering may pose subtle pitfalls but that some of these may be mitigated on-line.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Truth, Lies, and Deceit.Jeff Malpas - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):1-12.
Give or Take on the Internet: An Examinationof the Disclosure Practices of Insurance Firm Web Innovators. [REVIEW]Dennis M. Patten - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 36 (3):247 - 259.
Web 2.0 Vs. The Semantic Web: A Philosophical Assessment.Luciano Floridi - 2009 - Episteme 6 (1):25-37.
Do We See Through a Social Microscope?: Credibility as a Vicarious Selector.Douglas Allchin - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):298.
Reliability of Information on the Internet: Some Distinctions.Anton Vedder & Robert Wachbroit - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):211-215.
Added to index2010-07-22
Total downloads4 ( #648,412 of 2,177,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,245 of 2,177,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?