Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites

Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491 (2012)
Abstract
Call an argument a ‘happy sorites’ if it is a sorites argument with true premises and a false conclusion. It is a striking fact that although most philosophers working on the sorites paradox find it at prima facie highly compelling that the premises of the sorites paradox are true and its conclusion false, few (if any) of the standard theories on the issue ultimately allow for happy sorites arguments. There is one philosophical view, however, that appears to allow for at least some happy sorites arguments: strict finitism in the philosophy of mathematics. My aim in this paper is to explore to what extent this appearance is accurate. As we shall see, this question is far from trivial. In particular, I will discuss two arguments that threaten to show that strict finitism cannot consistently accept happy sorites arguments, but I will argue that (given reasonable assumptions on strict finitistic logic) these arguments can ultimately be avoided, and the view can indeed allow for happy sorites arguments
Keywords Finitism  Vagueness  Sorites  Sorites paradox  Strict finitism   Intuitionism  Constructivism  Cut elimination  Induction
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10992-011-9180-8
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Elements of Intuitionism.Michael A. E. Dummett - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The Taming of the True.Neil Tennant - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Wang's Paradox.Michael Dummett - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):201--32.
Don't Eliminate Cut.George Boolos - 1984 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (4):373 - 378.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On the Coherence of Wittgensteinian Constructivism.Amit Saad - 2016 - Acta Analytica 31 (4):455-462.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Schiffer on Vagueness.Matti Eklund - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):12–23.
A Defense of Strict Finitism.J. P. Bendegem - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):141-149.
Strict Finitism Refuted?Ofra Magidor - 2007 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (1pt3):403-411.
Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox.Richard DeWitt - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
Leibniz and the Sorites.Samuel Levey - 2002 - The Leibniz Review 12:25-49.
Sorites Paradoxes and the Transition Question.Mark Sainsbury - 1992 - Philosophical Papers 21 (3):177-190.
Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness.Susanne Bobzien - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):217-238.
Sorites Paradox and Conscious Experience.Tamás Pólya & László Tarnay - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):165-165.
Just What is Vagueness?Otávio Bueno & Mark Colyvan - 2012 - Ratio 25 (1):19-33.
Implicit Comparatives and the Sorites.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (1):1-8.
Qualia and Vagueness.Anthony Everett - 1996 - Synthese 106 (2):205-226.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-08-26

Total downloads

100 ( #49,138 of 2,153,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #119,783 of 2,153,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums