Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):678-682 (2014)

Abstract
A central task for clinical ethics consultants and committees (CEC) is providing analysis of, and advice on, prospective or retrospective clinical cases. However, several kinds of biases may threaten the integrity, relevance or quality of the CEC's deliberation. Bias should be identified and, if possible, reduced or counteracted. This paper provides a systematic classification of kinds of bias that may be present in a CEC's case deliberation. Six kinds of bias are discussed, with examples, as to their significance and risk factors. Possible remedies are suggested. The potential for bias is greater when the case deliberation is performed by an individual ethics consultant than when an entire clinical ethics committee is involved
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2013-101604
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.David M. Rasmussen - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.
A Critique of Principlism.K. D. Clouser & B. Gert - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):219-236.
Theory and Bioethics.John Arras - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Racism and Bioethics: Are We Part of the Problem?Anita Ho - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (4):23-25.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Deliberation: The Role of Methodologies in Clinical Ethics. [REVIEW]Diego Garcia - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):223-232.
The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside.John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Interpretation of Tests of Heterogeneity and Bias in Meta‐Analysis.John P. A. Ioannidis - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):951-957.
Case Method and Casuistry: The Problem of Bias.Loretta M. Kopelman - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
37 ( #306,844 of 2,505,782 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,782 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes