Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (1):18-21 (2012)
This paper makes two main claims: first, that the need to protect health professionals' moral integrity is what grounds the right to conscientious objection in health care; and second, that for a given claim of conscientious objection to be acceptable to society, a certain set of criteria should be fulfilled. The importance of moral integrity for individuals and society, including its special role in health care, is advocated. Criteria for evaluating the acceptability of claims to conscientious objection are outlined. The precise content of the criteria is dictated by the two main interests that are at stake in the dilemma of conscientious objection: the patient's interests and the health professional's moral integrity. Alternative criteria proposed by other authors are challenged. The bold claim is made that conscientious objection should be recognised by society as acceptable whenever the five main criteria of the proposed set are met
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Conscientious Objection to Referrals for Abortion: Pragmatic Solution or Threat to Women's Rights?Eva M. K. Nordberg, Helge Skirbekk & Morten Magelssen - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):15.
Medical Students’ Attitudes Towards Conscientious Objection: A Survey.Sven Nordstrand, Magnus Nordstrand, Per Nortvedt & Morten Magelssen - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (9):609-612.
Prenatal Diagnosis and the Christian Health Professional.Morten Magelssen - 2016 - Christian Bioethics 22 (3):325-339.
Similar books and articles
Why Liberal States Must Accommodate Tax Resistors.Jason Brennan - forthcoming - Public Affairs Quarterly.
Abortion: At the Still Point of the Turning Conscientious Objection Debate. [REVIEW]Elliott Louis Bedford - 2012 - HEC Forum 24 (2):63-82.
The Case for Pacifism and Conscientious Objection: A Reply to Professor G. C. Field. By Rev. E. L. Allen, Francis E. Pollard, and G. A. Sutherland. (London: Central Board for Conscientious Objectors. 1946. No Price Given.). [REVIEW]Helen Wodehouse - 1947 - Philosophy 22 (83):277-.
Conscientious Objection and the Morning-After Pill.Corrado Del Bò - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2):133-145.
Conscientious Objection and Emergency Contraception.Robert F. Card - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):8 – 14.
The Victorian Abortion Law - One Year On.Kevin McGovern - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):1.
Referral in the Wake of Conscientious Objection to Abortion.Carolyn McLeod - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 30-47.
Conscientious Objection, Emergency Contraception, and Public Policy.Robert F. Card - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (1):53-68.
Victorian Abortion Law Reform Bill 2008.Marcia Riordan - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (2):7.
Civil Disobedience, Conscientious Objection, and Evasive Noncompliance: A Framework for the Analysis and Assessment of Illegal Actions in Health Care.James F. Childress - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):63-84.
Added to index2011-12-15
Total downloads40 ( #129,937 of 2,172,022 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #30,969 of 2,172,022 )
How can I increase my downloads?