James Mahon
Lehman College (CUNY)
In this article Judith Jarvis Thomson's Good Samaritan Argument in defense of abortion in the case of rape is defended from two objections: the Kill vs. Let Die Objection, and the Intend to Kill vs. Merely Foresee Death Objection. The article concludes that these defenses do not defend Thomson from further objections from Peter Singer and David Oderberg.
Keywords Kill vs. Let Die  Intend vs. Foresee  abortion  Judith Jarvis Thomson  Good Samaritan  David Boonin  Peter Singer  David Oderberg  Rape  Trolley Problem
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Abortion and the Right to Not Be Pregnant.James Mahon - 2016 - In Allyn Fives & Keith Breen (eds.), Philosophy and Political Engagement: Reflection in the Public Sphere. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 57-77.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self-Sacrifice and the Trolley Problem.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (5):662-672.
Abortion and Ownership.John Martin Fischer - 2013 - The Journal of Ethics 17 (4):275-304.
Defusing Thomson's Violinist Analogy.Mathew Lu - 2013 - Human Life Review 39 (1):46-62.
Killing, Letting Die, and the Morality of Abortion.Anton Tupa - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):1-26.
Living High and Letting Die.Barry Smith & Berit Brogaard - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (3):435-442.
Applied Ethics.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1986 - Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
946 ( #3,703 of 2,324,384 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #14,190 of 2,324,384 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes