Objectivity, interpretation, and rights: A critique of Dworkin [Book Review]

Law and Philosophy 23 (2):187-222 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some puzzles about the objectivity of law.Connie S. Rosati - 2004 - Law and Philosophy 23 (3):273 - 323.
On the limits of rights.Andrei Marmor - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (1):1-18.
Terrance McConnell, inalienable rights.Alan Wertheimer - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (5):541-551.
The concept of fetal rights.Carl Wellman - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (1):65-93.
Judicial Review, Rights, and Democracy.Horacio Spector - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (3-4):285-334.
Raz on constitutional interpretation.Jeffrey Goldsworthy - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (2):167-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#301,274)

6 months
10 (#381,237)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jon Mahoney
Kansas State University

Citations of this work

Liberalism and the moral basis for human rights.Jon Mahoney - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (2):151 - 191.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Moral realism.Peter Railton - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):163-207.
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.Fred Feldman & J. L. Mackie - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):134.

View all 20 references / Add more references