A Gabbay-Rule Free Axiomatization of T x W Validity

Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (5):435 - 487 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The semantical structures called T x W frames were introduced in (Thomason, 1984) for the Ockhamist temporal-modal language, $[Unrepresented Character]_{o}$ , which consists of the usual propositional language augmented with the Priorean operators P and F and with a possibility operator ◇. However, these structures are also suitable for interpreting an extended language, $[Unrepresented Character]_{so}$ , containing a further possibility operator $\lozenge^{s}$ which expresses synchronism among possibly incompatible histories and which can thus be thought of as a cross-history 'simultaneity' operator. In the present paper we provide an infinite set of axioms in $[Unrepresented Character]_{so}$ , which is shown to be strongly complete for T x W-validity. Von Kutschera (1997) contains a finite axiomatization of T x W-validity which however makes use of the Gabbay Irreflexivity Rule (Gabbay, 1981). In order to avoid using this rule, the proof presented here develops a new technique to deal with reflexive maximal consistent sets in Henkin-style constructions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Derivation rules as anti-axioms in modal logic.Yde Venema - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (3):1003-1034.
T × W Completeness.Franz Kutschervona - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (3):241-250.
Knowledge of Validity.Sinan Dogramaci - 2010 - Noûs 44 (3):403-432.
Cut-rule axiomatization of the syntactic calculus L.Wojciech Zielonka - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (2):339-352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#359,513)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?