Cutting edges cut both ways

Biology and Philosophy 9 (1):1-24 (1994)
Abstract
Emphasis on cutting edge science is common today. This paper shows that the concept, which selects some science at any given time as epistemically preferable and therefore better, actually gained acceptance by the turn of this century in biology and began immediately to have consequences for what biological research was done. The result, that some research is cut out while other work is privileged, can have pernicious results. Some of what is designated as not cutting edge may, in a different — and equally defensible epistemological framework, prove just as good as the officially cutting edge research. Cutting edges cut both ways, and those who study science should begin exploring the implications of that fact.
Keywords Cutting edge  epistemological/epistemic  experimentation  embryology  cytology  Morgan  Harrison
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00849911
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,174
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Nettie M. Stevens and the Discovery of Sex Determination by Chromosomes.Stephen Brush - 1978 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 69:162-172.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
16 ( #302,694 of 2,180,068 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #305,690 of 2,180,068 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums