Distributive Justice in Firms

Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):129-143 (2001)
Abstract
Can we achieve greater fairness by reforming the corporation? Some recent progressive critics of the corporation arguethat we can achieve greater social justice both inside and outside the corporation by simply rewriting or reinterpreting corporate rulesto favor non-stockholders over stockholders. But the progressive program for reforming the corporation rests on a critical assumption,which I challenge in this essay, namely that the rules of the corporation matter, so that changing them can effect a lasting redistribution of wealth from stockholders to non-stockholders. This essay uses a critique of the progressive reform program to argue that the rules ofthe corporation are distributively neutral. The corporation isn't rigged against non-stockholders, and changing its rules will not improve the bargaining power of non-stockholders. However, while the rules may be epiphenomenal from the standpoint of distributive justice, they can have substantial impacts on the corporation's efficiency. As a result, the proposed reforms may hurt the corporation's capacity to generate benefits for all the parties concerned
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1052-150X
DOI 10.2307/3857873
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,777
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Securing Privacy at Work: The Importance of Contextualized Consent. [REVIEW]Elin Palm - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):233-241.
From Hired Hands to Co-Owners.John R. Boatright - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (4):471-496.
The New Case for the Ethics of Business.Gregory Wolcott - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 132 (1):127-146.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Moral Responsibilities of Stockholders.Richard J. Klonoski - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):385 - 390.
Distributive Justice and the Rules of the Corporation.John H. Beck - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):355-362.
The Morality of the Corporation.Ian Maitland - 1994 - Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):445-458.
The Corporation and Profits.David E. Schrader - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (8):589 - 601.
Corporate Power and Employee Relations.Gerald G. Biesinger - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (2):139 - 142.
Do Corporations Have Moral Rights?David T. Ozar - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):277 - 281.
Moral Hazards on the Road to the “Virtual” Corporation.Norman E. Bowie - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):273-292.
The Corporation as Actual Agreement.Gordon G. Sollars - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (3):351-370.
The Internal Morality of the Corporation.Lisa H. Newton - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (3):249 - 258.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-01-09

Total downloads

23 ( #221,085 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #45,332 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums