Mind and Language 20 (2):237-57 (2005)
Psychopaths are renowned for their immoral behavior. They are ideal candidates for testing the empirical plausibility of moral theories. Many think the source of their immorality is their emotional deficits. Psychopaths experience no guilt or remorse, feel no empathy, and appear to be perfectly rational. If this is true, sentimentalism is supported over rationalism. Here, I examine the nature of psychopathic practical reason and argue that it is impaired. The relevance to morality is discussed. I conclude that rationalists can explain the moral deficits of psychopaths as well as sentimentalists. In the process, I identify psychological structures that underpin practical rationality.
|Keywords||Children Ethics Practical Reason Psychopathy Reason|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Successful Psychopaths: Are They Unethical Decision-Makers and Why?Gregory W. Stevens, Jacqueline K. Deuling & Achilles A. Armenakis - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):139-149.
Dispositional Accounts of Evil Personhood.Luke Russell - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (2):231 - 250.
Similar books and articles
Diagnosing Blame: Responsibility and the Psychopath.Carl Elliott - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):199-214.
Responsibility Status of the Psychopath: On Moral Reasoning and Rational Self-Governance.Paul Litton - 2008 - Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. No., 2008 39 (349):350-392.
Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry, and Philosophy.Luca Malatesti & John McMillan (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads298 ( #10,350 of 2,171,881 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #40,663 of 2,171,881 )
How can I increase my downloads?