Quotation marks as monsters, or the other way around?

In Dekker Aloni (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium. pp. 145-150 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mixed quotation exhibits characteristics of both mention and use. Some even go so far as to claim it can be described wholly in terms of the pragmatics of language use. Thus, it may be argued that the observed shifting of indexicals under all quotation shows that a monstrous operator is involved. I will argue the opposite: a proper semantic account of quotation can be used to exorcize Schlenker's monsters from semantic theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,468

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Breaking Quotations.Emar Maier - 2008 - In Satoh et al (ed.), New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 187-200.
Varieties of Quotation Revisited.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2003 - Belgian Journal of Linguistics (17):51-75.
Quotation in Context.Bart Geurts & Emar Maier - 2005 - In Philippe de Brabanter (ed.), Hybrid Quotations. John Benjamins. pp. 109-28.
Varieties of Quotation.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 1997 - Mind 106 (423):429-450.
How quotation marks what people do with words.Daniel Gutzmann & Erik Stei - 2011 - Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10):2650-2663.
Understanding Mixed Quotation.Mark McCullagh - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):927-946.
Open quotation.François Recanati - 2001 - Mind 110 (439):637-687.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#309,651)

6 months
1 (#869,379)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emar Maier
University of Groningen

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references