Rights in the workplace: A Nozickian argument [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):951 - 954 (1989)

Abstract
There is a growing literature that attempts to define the substantive rights of employees in the workplace, a.k.a. the duties of employers toward their employees. Following Nozick, this article argues that — so long as there is a competitive labor market — to set up a class of moral rights in the workplace invades workers' rights to freely choose the terms and conditions of employment they judge best.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00383431
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,206
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Corporations and Morality.Thomas Donaldson - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (3):251-253.
Persons, Rights, and Corporations.Patricia Werhane - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (5):336-340.
Business Ethics: Profits, Utilities, and Moral Rights.Alan H. Goldman - 1980 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (3):260-286.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Virtue and Meaningful Work.Ronald Beadle & Kelvin Knight - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):433-450.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
189 ( #41,676 of 2,285,631 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #129,077 of 2,285,631 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature