The knower paradox and epistemic closure

Synthese 114 (2):337-354 (1998)
Authors
Stephen Maitzen
Acadia University
Abstract
The Knower Paradox has had a brief but eventful history, and principles of epistemic closure (which say that a subject automatically knows any proposition she knows to be materially implied, or logically entailed, by a proposition she already knows) have been the subject of tremendous debate in epistemic logic and epistemology more generally, especially because the fate of standard arguments for and against skepticism seems to turn on the fate of closure. As far as I can tell, however, no one working in either area has emphasized the result I emphasize in this paper: the Knower Paradox just falsifies even the most widely accepted general principles of epistemic closure. After establishing that result, I discuss five of its more important consequences.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Logic   Metaphysics   Philosophy of Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1005064624642
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,755
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Non‐Classical Knowledge.Ethan Jerzak - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
The Paradox of the Knower Revisited.Walter Dean & Hidenori Kurokawa - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (1):199-224.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
98 ( #61,721 of 2,263,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #380,599 of 2,263,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature