Neuroethics 1 (3):167-184 (2008)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
It is common for philosophers to argue that psychopaths are not morally responsible because they lack some of the essential capacities for morality. In legal terms, they are criminally insane. Typically, however, the insanity defense is not available to psychopaths. The primary reason is that they appear to have the knowledge and understanding required under the M’Naghten Rules. However, it has been argued that what is required for moral and legal responsibility is ‘deep’ moral understanding, something that psychopaths do not have either due to their lacking empathy or practical reason. In the first part of the paper, I argue that psychopaths do not lack the abilities required for deep moral understanding, although they have deficits in those areas. According the M’Naghten Rules, therefore, psychopaths are not insane. Under a less strict formulation of the insanity plea, like the Model Penal Code, however, there is a good case to be made for their lacking substantial capacity. I argue that because psychopathy is an essentially moral disorder, and because of the nature of psychopathic violence, psychopaths should not be excused under the insanity plea. It would be tantamount to excusing someone for committing a crime because they are bad. Arguably, this contravenes the entire system of law
|
Keywords | Criminal responsibility Legal responsibility Insanity Psychopathy Moral understanding Empathy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s12152-008-9013-9 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 34 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Direct Brain Interventions and Responsibility Enhancement.Elizabeth Shaw - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):1-20.
What Can Philosophers Learn From Psychopathy?Heidi L. Maibom - 2018 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 14 (1):63-78.
Moral Responsibility and Mental Illness: A Call for Nuance.Matt King & Joshua May - 2018 - Neuroethics 11 (1):11-22.
Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet.Ariane Bigenwald & Valerian Chambon - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
View all 24 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Autism, Empathy and Moral Agency.Jeanette Kennett - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (208):340-357.
Without Taste: Psychopaths and the Appreciation of Art.Heidi Maibom & James Harold - 2010 - Nouvelle Revue d'Esthétique 6:151-63.
The Responsibility of the Psychopath Revisited.Neil Levy - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (2):pp. 129-138.
Diagnosing Blame: Responsibility and the Psychopath.Carl Elliott - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (2):199-214.
Responsibility Status of the Psychopath: On Moral Reasoning and Rational Self-Governance.Paul Litton - 2008 - Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. No., 2008 39 (349):350-392.
Some Thoughts on Diverse Psychopathic Offenders and Legal Responsibility.Christopher Ciocchetti - 2003 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (2):195-198.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
633 ( #8,848 of 2,409,982 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #30,898 of 2,409,982 )
2009-01-28
Total views
633 ( #8,848 of 2,409,982 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #30,898 of 2,409,982 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads