Abstract
Meaningful participant engagement has been identified as a key contributor to the success of efforts to share data via a “Medical Information Commons”. We present findings from expert stakeholder interviews aimed at understanding barriers to engagement and the appropriate role of MIC participants. Although most interviewees supported engagement, they distinguished between individual versus collective forms. They also noted challenges including representation and perceived inefficiency, prompting reflection on political aspects of engagement and efficiency concerns.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1073110519840484
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,321
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Do Groups Have Moral Standing in Unregulated mHealth Research?Joon-Ho Yu & Eric Juengst - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S1):122-128.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Commons and Cognition.Carol M. Rose - 2018 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 19 (2):587-616.
Medical Ethics: Who Decides What?M. Kottow - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):105-108.
Locke, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Information Commons.Herman T. Tavani - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):87-97.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-18

Total views
8 ( #952,340 of 2,419,782 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,015 of 2,419,782 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes