Between Hartshorne and Molina

Process Studies 39 (1):129-148 (2010)
The doctrine of inerrant divine “middle knowledge” of future contingent events, first developed by the sixteenth century Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina, has resurfaced as a prominent position within contemporary debates over divine foreknowledge, creaturely freedom, and the ontological status of possibilities. As yet, the only substantive response to the new Molinism from a process perspective has come in a brief section on “Hartshorne and the Challenge of Molinism,” in an essay on Hartshorne’s view of “The Logic of Future Contingents” by George W. Shields and Donald W. Viney, in Shields’ edited anthology Process and Analysis.Shields and Viney offer an insightful critique of Molinism. However, their use of Hartshorne’s understanding of possibility presents problems for those, like me, who prefer Whitehead’s more robustly realist notion of eternal objects. Here, I defend Whitehead’s Platonism from the main lines of criticism leveled against itby Hartshorne, while demonstrating that a “thick” conception of the objective content of the possible within the context of the divine understanding need not crossover into a deterministic conception of God’s foreknowledge, à la Molina
Keywords Major Philosophers  Philosophy and Religion  Religious Studies
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0360-6503
DOI 10.5840/process20103919
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,793
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Molinism: The Contemporary Debate.Ken Perszyk (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Emergentism, Perspectivism, and Divine Pathos.Donald A. Crosby - 2010 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):196-206.
On Divine Foreknowledge.Alfred J. Freddoso (ed.) - 1988 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hartshorne's Response.Charles Hartshorne & L. Bryant Keeling - 1993 - Process Studies 22 (3):172-172.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
10 ( #474,488 of 2,214,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,169 of 2,214,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature