Between Hartshorne and Molina

Process Studies 39 (1):129-148 (2010)
Derek Malone-France
George Washington University
The doctrine of inerrant divine “middle knowledge” of future contingent events, first developed by the sixteenth century Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina, has resurfaced as a prominent position within contemporary debates over divine foreknowledge, creaturely freedom, and the ontological status of possibilities. As yet, the only substantive response to the new Molinism from a process perspective has come in a brief section on “Hartshorne and the Challenge of Molinism,” in an essay on Hartshorne’s view of “The Logic of Future Contingents” by George W. Shields and Donald W. Viney, in Shields’ edited anthology Process and Analysis.Shields and Viney offer an insightful critique of Molinism. However, their use of Hartshorne’s understanding of possibility presents problems for those, like me, who prefer Whitehead’s more robustly realist notion of eternal objects. Here, I defend Whitehead’s Platonism from the main lines of criticism leveled against itby Hartshorne, while demonstrating that a “thick” conception of the objective content of the possible within the context of the divine understanding need not crossover into a deterministic conception of God’s foreknowledge, à la Molina
Keywords Major Philosophers  Philosophy and Religion  Religious Studies
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0360-6503
DOI 10.5840/process20103919
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,208
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Molinism: The Contemporary Debate.Ken Perszyk (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Emergentism, Perspectivism, and Divine Pathos.Donald A. Crosby - 2010 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):196-206.
On Divine Foreknowledge.Alfred J. Freddoso (ed.) - 1988 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hartshorne's Response.Charles Hartshorne & L. Bryant Keeling - 1993 - Process Studies 22 (3):172-172.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
10 ( #494,926 of 2,242,611 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #410,355 of 2,242,611 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature