Conclusions: psychopathy and responsibility, a rejoinder

In Luca Malatesti & John McMillan (eds.), Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 319 (2010)

Authors
Luca Malatesti
University of Rijeka
Abstract
The philosophical contributes in the volume offer several considerations for the conclusion that psychopaths offenders should not be considered morally responsible for their crimes. We situate this conclusion within wider philosophical debates and indicate relevant directions of further research.
Keywords psychopathy  moral responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defending PCL-R.Luca Malatesti & John McMillan - 2010 - In Luca Malatesti & John McMillan (eds.), Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Psychopathy and Answerability.Antony Duff - 2010 - In Luca Malatesti & John McMillan (eds.), Responsibility and Psychopathy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 198-212.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-31

Total views
12 ( #579,111 of 2,325,334 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #416,543 of 2,325,334 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature