Defining Disposition Concepts: A brief history of the problem

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):335-353 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is twofold. Firstly, I give a brief account of the history of the debate on the problem of defining disposition concepts from its beginning in the late 1920s until today. This account is divided into four parts, corresponding with 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the paper, each of which deals with a major period of the debate. Section 2 reports up to the mid-1950s. Section 3 deals with important contributions to the discussion between 1955 and 1958. However, the progress made around that time was far ahead of the logical theory and techniques which were needed for foundational reasons and for a better understanding of the basic notions. Some logical techniques appropriate for that aim were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Though not uncontroversial, those logical techniques resulted in improvements of the insights gained in the mid-1950s; I shall report on those logical techniques and their application to the problem of defining disposition concepts in Section 4. In the early 1990s, however, the whole tradition of defining disposition concepts in terms of conditionals has been challenged by some strong counter-examples which are treated in Section 5. Finally, the second of the aims of this paper is explored in Section 6, in which I sketch very briefly the current stage of the debate by discussing and evaluating the most recent approaches to the subject.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A disposition-based process theory of causation.Andreas Hüttemann - 2013 - In Stephen Mumford & Matthew Tugby (eds.), Metaphysics and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 101.
What First Third Person Processes Really Are.Eugene Gendlin - 2009 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (10-12):10-12.
I. Addis on analysing disposition concepts.Fred Wilson - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):247-260.
Lehrer Meets Ranking Theory.Wolfgang Spohn - 2002 - In Erik J. Olsson (ed.), The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Knowledge, certainty and probability.Herbert Heidelberger - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):242 – 250.
Toulmin’s Logical Types.David Botting - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (2):433-449.
Dispositions, causes, and reduction.Jennifer McKitrick - 2009 - In Toby Handfield (ed.), Dispositions and Causes. Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press ;.
Dispositions and Their Ascriptions.Michael Fara - 2001 - Dissertation, Princeton University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
104 (#154,461)

6 months
13 (#117,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wolfgang Malzkorn
Fachhochschule Der Wirtschaft Nordrhein Westfalen

Citations of this work

The Powerlessness of Necessity.Markus Schrenk - 2010 - Noûs 44 (4):725-739.
Dispositions.Michael Fara - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dispositions.Sungho Choi - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Carnap on Empirical Significance.Sebastian Lutz - 2017 - Synthese 194 (1):217-252.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Causation.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (17):556-567.
Psychophysical and theoretical identifications.David K. Lewis - 1972 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):249-258.
Finkish dispositions.David Kellogg Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):143-158.
Testability and meaning.Rudolf Carnap - 1936 - Philosophy of Science 3 (4):419-471.

View all 49 references / Add more references