Direct perception

Philosophical Quarterly 3 (October):301-316 (1953)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords After-image  Description  Epistemology  Incorrigibility  Perception  Moore
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2217098
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,692
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The New Hybrids: Continuing Debates on Social Perception.Shaun Gallagher - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 36:452-465.
Afterimages and Sensation.Ian Phillips - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (2):417-453.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is Direct Perceptual Knowledge? A Fivefold Confusion.Douglas J. McDermid - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):1-16.
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception.Michael Huemer - 2001 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Was Moore Talking Nonsense in 1918?James D. Carney - 1962 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (June):521-527.
The Problems of Perception.John Knox - 1969 - Personalist 50 (2):254-267.
Response to Sapontzis.D. D. Todd - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (June):566-568.
Direct Perception.D. D. Todd - 1975 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 35 (March):352-362.
Looks, Impressions and Incorrigibility.Irving Thalberg - 1965 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25 (March):365-374.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
77 ( #95,264 of 2,328,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #725,336 of 2,328,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature