Defending PCL-R

In Luca Malatesti & John McMillan (eds.), Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy. Oxford University Press (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter we argue that Robert Hare's psychopathy checklist revised (PCL-R) offers a construct of psychopathy that is valid enough for philosophical investigations of the moral and legal responsibility of psychopathic offenders.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defending affirmative action, defending preferences.James P. Sterba - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (2):285–300.
Defending Wordsworth, Defending Poetry.Mark Edmundson - 1995 - Philosophy and Literature 19 (2):207-213.
Defending 'Defending Musical Perdurantism'.Ben Caplan & Carl Matheson - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):80-85.
Self-determination, wellbeing, and threats of harm.Antony Lamb - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):145–158.
Puzzles on defending others from aggression.Eduardo Rivera-López - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 25 (3):377-386.
Defending the Nation.John Krige - 2007 - Minerva 45 (4):489-493.
Defending Equality of Opportunity.John E. Roemer - 2003 - The Monist 86 (2):261-282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
45 (#345,268)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luca Malatesti
University of Rijeka

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references