Do We Deserve Credit for Everything We Understand?

Episteme:1-20 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It is widely acknowledged in the literature in social epistemology that knowledge has a social dimension: we are epistemically dependent upon one another for most of what we know. Our knowledge can be, and very often is, grounded on the epistemic achievement of somebody else. But what about epistemic aims other than knowledge? What about understanding? Prominent authors argue that understanding is not social in the same way in which knowledge is. Others can put us in the position to understand, but when we understand something, this accomplishment is to be credited mainly if not entirely to us, as it is due to the successful exercise of our own cognitive abilities. In this paper, I show that the social dimension of understanding closely resembles the social dimension of knowledge. I distinguish between three different ways in which a subject can depend upon another subject for (either the acquisition or the possession of) a certain epistemic good. I then argue that all these kinds of epistemic dependence apply to knowledge and understanding alike. If I am right, understanding is not (always) an achievement to be (mainly) credited to the single epistemic agent who understands.

Similar books and articles

Epistemic value and achievement.Daniel Whiting - 2012 - Ratio 25 (2):216-230.
On Understanding and Testimony.Federica Isabella Malfatti - 2019 - Erkenntnis 86 (6):1345-1365.
Testimony, epistemic egoism, and epistemic credit.Jason Kawall - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):463-477.
Can Testimony Generate Understanding?Federica Isabella Malfatti - 2019 - Social Epistemology 33 (6):477-490.
Responsibility for Testimonial Belief.Benjamin McMyler - 2012 - Erkenntnis 76 (3):337-352.
Other–regarding epistemic virtues.Jason Kawall - 2002 - Ratio 15 (3):257–275.
Testifying understanding.Kenneth Boyd - 2017 - Episteme 14 (1):103-127.
The social virtues: Two accounts. [REVIEW]S. Goldberg - 2009 - Acta Analytica 24 (4):237-248.
Knowledge and social identity.Briana Marie Toole - 2021 - Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin


Added to PP

177 (#91,491)

6 months
67 (#41,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Federica Isabella Malfatti
University of Innsbruck

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Understanding Why.Alison Hills - 2015 - Noûs 49 (2):661-688.
No understanding without explanation.Michael Strevens - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):510-515.
Epistemic dependence.John Hardwig - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (7):335-349.
Considered Judgment.Catherine Z. Elgin - 1999 - Princeton University Press.

View all 27 references / Add more references