Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):253-268 (1994)
McCloskey's work on the rhetoric of economics has little to say about Imre Lakatos, and indeed the scientific method prescribed by Lakatos, as it stands, would support McCloskey's claim that philosophers? imperatives bear little relation to what economists actually do. But a Bayesianized version of Lakatos is a different matter, and provides a yardstick against which the various rhetorical devices noted by McCloskey can be measured. We argue that McCloskey's list can be divided into those forms of persuasion which would and would not remain convincing once the reader saw how the persuasion was being worked, and that this distinction corresponds precisely to those forms of persuasion which do and do not represent the ?Bayesianized Lakatos? method.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns?Alexander Rosenberg - 1992 - University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Economic rhetoric and the explanation of success.Robert Nadeau - 2001 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 3:351-369.
For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence.Imre Lakatos, Paul Feyerabend & Matteo Motterlini - 2000 - University of Chicago Press.
Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend for and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos–Feyerabend Correspondence. [REVIEW]Brendan Larvor - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):919-922.
Sound and Fury: McCloskey and Significance Testing in Economics.Kevin D. Hoover & Mark V. Siegler - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1):1-37.
Statistical Vs. Economic Significance in Economics and Econometrics: Further Comments on McCloskey and Ziliak.Tom Engsted - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (4):393-408.
Mccloskey's Rhetoric: Discourse Ethics in Economics.Benjamin Balak - 2006 - Routledge.
The Rhetoric of 'Signifying Nothing': A Rejoinder to Ziliak and McCloskey.Kevin D. Hoover & Mark V. Siegler - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1):57-68.
Economic History and Economic Theory.Filippo Cesarano - 2006 - Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (4):447-467.
Signifying Nothing: Reply to Hoover and Siegler.Deirdre N. McCloskey & Stephen T. Ziliak - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1):39-55.
Evaluating Growth Theories and Their Empirical Support: An Assessment of the Convergence Hypothesis.Nevin Cavusoglu & Edinaldo Tebaldi - 2006 - Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1):49-75.
On a Maze of Second Thoughts and on the Methodology of Economic Methodology.Siobhain McGovern - 1995 - Journal of Economic Methodology 2 (2):223-238.
The Rhetoric of Policy Relevance in International Economics.William Milberg - 1996 - Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (2):237-259.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads10 ( #428,709 of 2,163,624 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,270 of 2,163,624 )
How can I increase my downloads?