Ethics and the Environment 13 (2):pp. 119-141 (2008)
Christian fundamentalist dominionism is susceptible to a conventional ecological critique; that is to say, one framed in scientific-environmentalist terms of its unsustainability as a practice, given nature’s finite resources and the fragility of ecosystems. Alternatively, a postmodern ecological critique has the conceptual tools to contest dominionism at the level of its discursive transactions, that is to say, the narrative frames and interpretive methods through which fundamentalists have constructed their understanding of the natural world. I shall suggest how postmodernism enables critical standpoints which, collectively, open a second front in an engagement with the dominionist model of humanity’s relationship to nature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shifting Ground: Metanarratives, Epistemology, and the Stories of Nature.Rebecca Raglon & Marian Scholtmeijer - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (1):19-38.
Toward a More Expansive Conception of Ecological Science.Kevin de Laplante - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (2):263-281.
Critical Consciousness in the Postmodern Condition.Lieven Boeve - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):449-468.
Deep Ecology and the Foundations of Restoration.Michael Vincent McGinnis - 1996 - Inquiry 39 (2):203 – 217.
Rational Fundamentalism? An Explanatory Model of Fundamentalist Beliefs.Michael Baurmann - 2007 - Episteme 4 (2):150-166.
A Postmodern Natural History of the World: Eviscerating the GUTs From Ecology and Environmentalism.A. Marshall - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 29 (1):137-164.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #265,996 of 2,154,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,154,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?