Fara’s Formula and the Supervaluational Thin Red Line

Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (2):267-282 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Este artículo se centra en un argumento presentado por Fara (2010) en contra del supervaluacionismo en el contexto de la vaguedad. Muestro cómo dicho argumento es igualmente aplicable al supervaluacionismo de tiempo ramificado (presentado por primera vez por Thomason 1970), pero no a la semántica 'STRL' de Malpass y Wawer (2012), que está estrechamente relacionada

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
90 (#184,394)

6 months
4 (#754,937)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Malpass
University of Bristol

References found in this work

Past, present and future.Arthur N. Prior - 1967 - Oxford,: Clarendon P..
Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Facing the future: agents and choices in our indeterminist world.Nuel D. Belnap - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Michael Perloff & Ming Xu.
Past, present, and future.Arthur Prior - 1967 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 157:476-476.

View all 14 references / Add more references