Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):83 – 95 (2006)
The controversial question of whether a future child can be harmed by the use of reproductive technology turns on the way that the future child's identity is understood. As a result, analysis of the ethical and legal obligations to the children of reproductive technology that are based upon the possibility of such harm depends upon the conception of identity that is used. This paper reviews the contributions of two recent books, David DeGrazia's Human Identity and Bioethics (2005) and Philip Peters' How Safe is Safe Enough? (2004) to this area of inquiry. It suggests that the use of a narrative rather than numerical conception of identity makes it possible to coherently claim that future children can be harmed by the use of reproductive technologies and that, as a result, potential parents can have obligations regarding the use of those technologies based upon that possibility of harm.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Non-Identity Problem and Genetic Harms – the Case of Wrongful Handicaps.Dan W. Brock - 1995 - Bioethics 9 (3):269–275.
How Safe is Safe Enough?: Obligations to the Children of Reproductive Technology.Philip G. Peters - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Getting Back to the Fundamentals of Clinical Ethics.Laurence B. Mccullough - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (1):1 – 6.
Emerging Ethical Issues in Reproductive Medicine:Are Bioethics Educators Ready?Ruth M. Farrell, Jonathan S. Metcalfe, Michelle L. McGowan, Kathryn L. Weise, Patricia K. Agatisa & Jessica Berg - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (5):21-29.
Similar books and articles
Futures of Reproduction: Bioethics and Biopolitics.Catherine Mills - 2011 - Springer.
Using Arendt and Heidegger to Consider Feminist Thinking on Women and Reproductive / Infertility Technologies.Maren Klawiter - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (3):65 - 89.
Harming by Conceiving: A Review of Misconceptions and a New Analysis. [REVIEW]Carson Strong - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):491 – 516.
Beyond Choice: Reproductive Freedom in the 21st Century.Alexander Sanger - 2004 - Public Affairs.
Harm to Future Persons: Non-Identity Problems and Counterpart Solutions.Anthony Wrigley - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):175-190.
Should Cloning Be Banned for the Sake of the Child?Helga Kuhse - 2001 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (1):17-33.
Safety, Identity and Consent: A Limited Defense of Reproductive Human Cloning.Robert Lane - 2006 - Bioethics 20 (3):125–135.
Choosing Future People: Reproductive Technologies and Identity.Mark Greene - 2009 - In Vardit Ravitsky, Autumn Fiester & Arthur L. Caplan (eds.), The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics. Springer Publishing Company. pp. 307-317.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #137,271 of 2,177,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #54,820 of 2,177,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?