In which sense can we talk about a dialogue between the sciences? An essay concerning the new sciences of complexity
A dialogue between the exact, the physical and the natural sciences along with the social and human sciences is both possible and necessary. The place where such a dialogue is truly prosperous is the one of the new sciences of complexity. However, with the study of complex systems, the very traditional status of the sciences changesdramatically.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Toward a Theory of Human History.Joseph Margolis - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (3-4):245-273.
Mathematics in the Biological Sciences.Not By Me - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):241 – 248.
Objectivity in Social Science: Toward a Hermeneutical Evolutionary Theory.Ricardo Waizbort - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):151-162.
Certainty and Domain-Independence in the Sciences of Complexity: A Critique of James Franklin's Account of Formal Science.Kevin de Laplante - unknown
Structure and Domain-Independence in the Formal Sciences.James Franklin - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30:721-723.
Self-Organized Complexity in the Physical, Biological, and Social Sciences.Donald Lawson Turcotte, John Rundle & Hans Frauenfelder (eds.) - 2002 - National Academy of Sciences.
The Behavioral Sciences Are Historical Sciences of Emergent Complexity.Larry Arnhart - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):18-19.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #555,654 of 2,164,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?