La mimesi e la metafora nella poetica di Aristotele

Acta Philosophica 1 (2) (1992)

Abstract

Although Aristotle attributes to metaphor - as an instrument that makes poetic imitation possible to the highest degree - an important function, he does not arrive at the conclusion that the essence of poetics is the metaphor. This is due, on the one hand, to the almost total identification of the poem with the tragedy, showing little interest in what we consider lyric poetry; on the other hand, for the little attention given to religious poetry. If the Stagirite had analyzed these genres, he would have discovered that both have in common the attempt to express the ineffable. Metaphor is the privileged tool to talk about something that we can not conceptualize, because it is partially unknown to us - subjectivity - or because this reality (the divine) transcends all kinds of sensible experience. Hence, the metaphor becomes not only an analogical knowledge of sensible reality, but also communication of ineffable realities.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-07

Downloads
11 (#858,955)

6 months
1 (#388,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

La metafora nel Medioevo latino.Umberto Eco - 2004 - Doctor Virtualis 3:35-75.
La metafora laica dei poeti.Stefano Raimondi - 2004 - Doctor Virtualis 3:123-129.

Author's Profile

Antonio Malo
Pontificia Universita Della Santa Croce

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations