Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (2):151-152 (2013)

Authors
Lambros Malafouris
Cambridge University
Abstract
Bullot & Reber (B&R) begin asking if the study of the mind's inner life can provide a foundation for a science of art. Clearly there are many epistemological problems involved in the study of the cognitive and affective basis of art appreciation. I argue that context is key. I also propose that as long as the continues to be perceived as an intracranial phenomenon, little progress can be made. Mind and art are one
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x12001719
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,968
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Cognitive Ecology.Edwin Hutchins - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):705-715.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
15 ( #643,805 of 2,403,350 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,892 of 2,403,350 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes