Balkan Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):125-132 (2019)

Authors
Maja Malec
University of Ljubljana
Abstract
The bucket experiment in Newton’s Principia is quite simple. Nonetheless, physicists as well as philosophers and historians of science are still debating its purpose and success. I present two interpretations found in the literature. According to the first, Newton tries to prove absolute rotation and thus the existence of absolute space. According to the second, he tries to provide a definition of absolute rotation as it is used in his mechanics. Closely connected to this is his rejection of Descartes’ explanation of rotation and of motion in general. I conclude with a short discussion on whether the bucket experiment can be classified as a thought experiment.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1313-888X
DOI 10.5840/bjp201911213
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,379
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Newton's Bucket Experiment.Ronald Laymon - 1978 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (4):399--413.
Newton’s Bucket Experiment From Kantian Perspective.Yaohua Zhu - 2018 - Open Journal of Philosophy 8 (5):437-443.
Two Berkelian Arguments About the Nature of Space.Howard Robinson - 2011 - In Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage (eds.), Berkeley's Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 79-90.
Absolute Space and the Riddle of Rotation: Kant’s Response to Newton.Marius Stan - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 7:257-308.
Leibniz and Newton on Space.Ori Belkind - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):467-497.
Newton’s Conceptual Argument for Absolute Space.Ori Belkind - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):271 – 293.
When Are Thought Experiments Poor Ones?Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):305-322.
Huygens on Inertial Structure and Relativity.Marius Stan - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (2):277-298.
Newton and Wolff: The Leibnizian Reaction to the Principia, 1716-1763.Marius Stan - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):459-481.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-28

Total views
13 ( #772,533 of 2,519,681 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,681 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes