Náboženské racionale v liberální demokracii: Vyloučení, zahrnutí a hledání třetích cest [The Religious Rationale in Democracy: Exclusion, Inclusion and Search for Third Ways]

Social Studies / Socialni Studia 10 (3):61–83 (2013)
Authors
Pavel Dufek
Masaryk University
Abstract
The article provides a focused overview of the recent debates in political philosophy on the role of religious arguments (as reasons for action) in liberal democracy, as well as a preliminary defence of a particular approach to the issue. Drawing on Christopher Eberle’s typology, we distinguish three main camps – Justificatory Liberalism, basing its advocacy of a “doctrine of religious restraint” on Rawls’s account of public justification; its Liberal Critics, embracing a wholly permissive position vis-à-vis religious arguments in the public sphere; and New Traditionalism, which assigns priority to the religious rationale. The article deals in more detail with the exchange between the first two camps. Upon considering their strengths and weaknesses, we argue for a more robust “third way” between exclusion from and unqualified inclusion of religious arguments in public debates in liberal democracy. Inspired by the work of Gerald Gaus and Kevin Vallier, we the outline in the closing sections a framework of such “minimal justificatory liberalism” that steers clear of several errors shared by both the defenders and the critics of justificatory liberalism.
Keywords Religious Arguments  Liberal Democracy  Public Justification  Justificatory Liberalism  Doctrine of Religious Restraint
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Religion, Pacifism, and the Doctrine of Restraint.Christopher J. Eberle - 2006 - Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (2):203-224.
Religion, Respect and Eberle's Agapic Pacifist.R. B. Talisse - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (3):313-325.
Basic Human Worth and Religious Restraint.C. J. Eberle - 2009 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (1-2):151-181.
Consensus, Convergence, Restraint, and Religion.Paul Billingham - 2018 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 15 (3):345-361.
Rights, Reasons, and Religious Conflict.Glen Pettigrove - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:81-93.
Political Liberalism and Religious Claims: Four Blind Spots.Kristina Stoeckl - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (1):34-50.
Religious Conviction in the Profession of Arms.Christopher J. Eberle & Rick Rubel - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (3):171-185.
Liberalism, Religion And Integrity.Kevin Vallier - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):149 - 165.
On Jonathan Quong’s Sectarian Political Liberalism.Kevin Vallier - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):175-194.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-09

Total views
32 ( #211,329 of 2,312,747 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #61,818 of 2,312,747 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature