On relative orbital rotation in relativity theory

In A. Ashtekar (ed.), Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics. pp. 175--190 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider the following question within both Newtonian physics and relativity theory. "Given two point particles X and Y, if Y is rotating relative to X, does it follow that X is rotating relative to Y?" As it stands the question is ambiguous. We discuss one way to make it precise and show that, on that reading at least, the answers given by the two theories are radically different. The relation of relative orbital rotation turns out to be symmetric in Newtonian physics, but not in relativity theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,419

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Classical relativity theory.David Malament - 2005 - In Jeremy N. Butterfield & John Earman (eds.), Philosophy of Physics. Elsevier.
Miejsce teorii względności w obszarze wiedzy ludzkiej.Jan Such - 2006 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 54 (2):219-228.
What, if anything, are colours relative to?John Hyman - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (4):475-494.
Dynamics of theory change in chemistry: Part 2. benzene and molecular orbitals, 1945-1980.G. S. - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (2):263-302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
31 (#379,464)

6 months
3 (#227,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The rotating discs argument defeated.Jeremy Butterfield - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):1-45.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references